Attention is currently required from: pespin, fixeria, dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341 ) Change subject: pcu_l1_if_phy: flexible phy access ...................................................................... Patch Set 9: (1 comment) Patchset: PS9: well, in the classic (12.21 based) information model, the BSC knows everything and it spreads its knowledge to the BTSs. And in case of BTS-colocated PCU, the BTS then passes things to the PCU (see how the NSVC are configured in osmo-bsc.cfg). In general I also like that, as it reduces the amount of things an operator needs to configure on each and every of their (potentially many) remote sites. We might also get back to fixeria's idea in the meeting today: have separte binaries like osmo-pcu-{rbs,sysmo,...} to avoid the problem. Many alternatives, I'm not deep enough into the topic to have a clear idea. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I8692d1bd5d137a17cf596ee2914722f419c9978d Gerrit-Change-Number: 31341 Gerrit-PatchSet: 9 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:18:57 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment