Attention is currently required from: pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/30126
)
Change subject: [codecs filter] use filter result
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS1:
looking at this patch again, it looks rather unclear why the codecs filter result ends up
in assignment... it looks much cleaner in a later patch, where i must still investigate a
minor odd change in MNCC behavior. I adjusted the commit log to explain...
I think i will wait until that follow up patch is ready before submitting a new patch
set.
BTW, it is super complex to explain the legacy code and its transition to a new
implementation, i'm beginning to think i should just have secretly merged that code
bomb without anyone noticing, instead of kneading through all of these weird details ;)
File tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/30126/comment/09923322_ae1f2455
PS1, Line 320: MGW <--CRCX to RTP_TO_CN-- MSC: callref=0x80000001
codecs=VND.3GPP.IUFP#96
Is this change AMR->IUFP expected?
yes, i
also find it curious... note that the surrounding logging indicates UTRAN, so I expect
that previous code erratically used AMR in the first CRCX instead of the IUFP that we are
actually (so far) feeding through to the CN. It is definitely correct to show IUFP here.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/30126
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I66e7c8c5e401f4f3a7d3d42b9525b2c6e99691d9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30126
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:31:57 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment