Attention is currently required from: osmith, laforge, pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/33591 )
Change subject: csd_bs_list_to_gsm0808_channel_type: add T 300
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
File src/libmsc/csd_bs.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/33591/comment/95e87e88_e812cc0a
PS1, Line 196: GSM0808_DATA_FULL_BM
technically it is true, one can carry those rates over
TCH/H. I'm not sure how good a policy decision it is, given that TCH/F provides so
much more redundancy and hence robustness...
IIUC the idea behind `GSM0808_DATA_FULL_PREF` is that we allocate a TCH/F whenever
possible, or a TCH/H if no TCH/F is available. If my understanding is correct, then giving
a TCH/H is still better than rejecting a connection...
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/33591
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7297cc481fbe36355b5231ca800cf566a1ee93c0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33591
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:17:43 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment