Attention is currently required from: arehbein, laforge, pespin.
daniel has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720?usp=email )
Change subject: gsmtap: Hide implementation of gsmtap_inst
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS2:
I didn't prefix the function with osmo_-anything,
because the other functions in gsmtap_util. […]
That's okay, we want to keep it
consistent. The reason for the missing osmo_* is that this is very early code and we
simply didn't use any common prefix back then. Now we're stuck with it due to
backwards compatibility.
File src/core/libosmocore.map:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720/comment/a65667de_1be9595f
PS2, Line 42: gsmtap_inst_fd;
Not sure if this needs a line in TODO-RELEASE? It seems like an addition to the ABI, even
if it was static inline in the header before.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibe1a51205a6df764571b6d074e365825555609a5
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34720
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:41:41 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment