Attention is currently required from: fixeria, laforge, osmith.
pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/38375?usp=email )
Change subject: ss7 vty: Fix insert order of routes with higher priority
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(1 comment)
File tests/vty/osmo_stp_route_prio.vty:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/38375/comment/e00eef81_a38ad…
:
PS2, Line 87: 3.2.1/14 0 as3 ? ? ?
I agree, we should also use 5 as default. […]
@laforge@gnumonks.org I'm fine with that, I can do that in a follow-up patch.
Something related to discuss though: We are currently storing the value in uint32_t value
in strcut osmo_ss7_route cfg.
We could make that one a uint8_t, but that may break ABI compatibility.I'll check
because anyway since we added secondary_pc we are already breaking ABI since last
version.
TBH I think we should break ABI once and move as many as possible of those structs into
private headers. Same goes for most of the APIs too.
This would make it far easier improving the library, since anyway when adding features
will keep otherwise breaking ABI again and again.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/38375?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sigtran
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6e7b5e3f06ae2c9468da58c55d2f42cbcd777218
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38375
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:54:22 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>