Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge, pespin.
lynxis lazus has posted comments on this change by lynxis lazus. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37869?usp=email )
Change subject: GMM: split parsing of a RA Update Request in a separate file
......................................................................
Patch Set 23:
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37869/comment/9e7dba91_0b5ac8ca?us… :
PS21, Line 9: gprs_gmm.c is huge. Further split the general validation
: and parsing of the message into an own function.
:
does it make sense to do this split for a single
message? If we think the code should be split, sho […]
Yes, it would be great to do
it for multiple messages. But it is also moving parts out of it, validating it, add a new
message struct.
File src/sgsn/gprs_gmm_util.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37869/comment/8b435c60_0b9ff769?us… :
PS15, Line 54: * \param[in] msg l3 pointers must point to gmm. Return 0 on success or GMM
cause
this documentation looks broken. […]
Done
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37869?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-sgsn
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I413da1b6b4b7c0c4781393acd8564661bc74ce2d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37869
Gerrit-PatchSet: 23
Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:07:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>