Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge, pespin. lynxis lazus has posted comments on this change by lynxis lazus. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37869?usp=email ) Change subject: GMM: split parsing of a RA Update Request in a separate file ...................................................................... Patch Set 23: (2 comments) Commit Message: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37869/comment/9e7dba91_0b5ac8ca?usp... : PS21, Line 9: gprs_gmm.c is huge. Further split the general validation : and parsing of the message into an own function. :
does it make sense to do this split for a single message? If we think the code should be split, sho […] Yes, it would be great to do it for multiple messages. But it is also moving parts out of it, validating it, add a new message struct.
File src/sgsn/gprs_gmm_util.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37869/comment/8b435c60_0b9ff769?usp... : PS15, Line 54: * \param[in] msg l3 pointers must point to gmm. Return 0 on success or GMM cause
this documentation looks broken. […] Done
-- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37869?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: osmo-sgsn Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I413da1b6b4b7c0c4781393acd8564661bc74ce2d Gerrit-Change-Number: 37869 Gerrit-PatchSet: 23 Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <lynxis@fe80.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:07:24 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de>