Attention is currently required from: osmith, dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/34192
)
Change subject: pcuif_proto: use confirmation flag in struct gsm_pcu_if_pch
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS1:
Same as I said on the other patch: I'm not liking this approach. Keep the BSC decoding
the message type to know what to do with it, and let the "confirm" variable be
simply a bool on whether the BSC answers to the PCU when it schedules/transmits it.
File src/osmo-bsc/pcu_sock.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/34192/comment/b9284b7d_4e084523
PS1, Line 552: if (pch->confirmed_imm_ass)
* What happens if using a newer osmo-bsc with an older
osmo-pcu which does not send the field? (see […]
@osmith this should not be a
problem since there's a PCUIF version bump 10->11. But yes, it would be nice to
have such sort of information in the commit message ;)
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/34192
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3d2842626b7e8325860ea3160c7d900d39e953a0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34192
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:58:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment