Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/37645?usp=email )
Change subject: library/GTPv1U_Templates: Mark parameters as templates
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
File library/GTPv1U_Templates.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/37645/comment/ae42e5b9_05e6…
PS1, Line 58: template (value)
It helps in easying the posibility to pass both values
and template.
As I said, yes, it helps for complex types like records and unions. But I still don't
see why would you want to pass e.g. `teid` in form of a template. Do we even have
templates for `teid` or `seq`? I don't think so.
By commenting here I don't want to block your patchset. I just wanted to bring up a
general trend that I am seeing in our code base: are we doing this for a specific reason
or just because it looks prettier if all parameters of a template are templates too ;)
For now I don't see a clear motivation for doing that.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/37645/comment/51e25797_617a…
PS1, Line 61: template (value) GTPU_IEs ies
It doesn't cause a problem either, and allows for
more freedom to the caller/user of the template.
If this was the actual IUT and not
tests, I would argue that this freedom comes at the cost of performance. However, this is
tests and we don't care much... we can even create functions returning const values,
just because we can.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/37645?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I278f7dbc64704c1ba2b8a75d6f540ac52b067598
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37645
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:00:49 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment