Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
arehbein has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602 )
Change subject: WIP: vty: Add check against sensible default value for Ny1
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(4 comments)
File include/osmocom/bsc/bts.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/3e92aee9_e2d4e3a7
PS5, Line 837: static inline bool gsm_bts_check_ny1
Is it really necessary to have this function static
inline in a header? […]
Done
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/51b4dada_6ddab62a
PS5, Line 839: struct gsm_lchan *gl
const […]
it's the initials of `gsm_lchan`.
Do you mean I should put `struct gsm_lchang const *` instead to make clear contents are
not to be changed?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/03af4f18_96a50806
PS5, Line 842: if (gl) {
Not critical, but could be done a bit simpler: […]
I would actually prefer it as is, at least I find there is a gain in readability
that makes up for a few additional lines.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/aacec502_8d726321
PS5, Line 855: talloc_strdup_append
Looks way too complicated, IMO. How about this? […]
Ah yeah thanks! I don't know what I was doing there
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If3f96a6bd4f9ae32b6421de43c1c5a5d64482089
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30602
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 15:52:33 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment