Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin, fixeria.
neels has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/27631
)
Change subject: libosmo-pfcp: implement PFCP header and msg handling
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/pfcp/pfcp_msg.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/27631/comment/e1f2fac1_e2d2c39c
PS3, Line 44: #define OSMO_LOG_PFCP_MSG_SRC(M, LEVEL, file, line, FMT, ARGS...) do { \
Its also the first time we are reaching this kind of
complexit in a log macro...
in principle LOG_TS(), LOG_LCHAN() and others are doing
similar things.
You can see them with this run across all osmo trees:
rgrep '#define.LOG_.*do' -A 10
I don't understand why you guys oppose this being a macro, and I guess I never will.
But if you insist, I can change it to a va_list function.
Maybe in a separate patch?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/27631
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-upf
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3f85ea052a6b7c064244a8093777e53a47c8c61e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27631
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 11:40:39 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment