Attention is currently required from: pespin.
dexter has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34077 )
Change subject: SGSN_Tests: add RIM ROUTING ADDRESS field in request
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34077/comment/0337a351_fc4e…
PS1, Line 13:
AFAIU the spec you are mentioning clearly states the
opposite: Those are OPTIONAL. […]
I have changed the commit message now a bit, but I
am still a bit confused. I thought those fields were mandatory, at least in the situation
where the message has to be routed.
But when I interpret 3GPP TS 23.060, section 8.1.5.2.2 correctly, then the RIM ROUTING
ADDRESS isn't required at all. It's always "destination address or on the RIM
routing address". From this I conclude that we probably use the RIM ROUTING ADDRESS
if it is present, if not we may use the destination address in the RAN TRANSPARENT
CONTAINER. This also means that it is not prohibited to look into the RAN TRANSPARENT
container.
I think this eventually means that we would need two tests: One without RIM ROUTING
ADDRESS and one with.
What do you think?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34077
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id944c66f28d787a18c6c6f7c9dc885997d83e94c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34077
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 12:37:53 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment