Attention is currently required from: fixeria, pespin.
falconia has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448?usp=email )
Change subject: SMS over GSUP: implement vty config of SMSC routing
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/hlr/hlr_sms.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448/comment/185a6aa4_a806beb9
PS2, Line 17: void smsc_del(struct hlr_smsc *smsc);
Well, this "usual" naming does not apply
here: […]
I modeled this code after the existing one for EUSEs and USSD routes,
which - as @fixeria noted - uses _del rather than _free. What is the community consensus
here? Should I change my patch to use _free? Should all existing usage of _del in osmo-hlr
also be changed to _free?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hlr
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1624dcd9d22b4efca965ccdd1c74f0063a94a33c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34448
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:59:05 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment