Attention is currently required from: fixeria, pespin.

View Change

1 comment:

• File include/osmocom/hlr/hlr_sms.h:

  • Patch Set #2, Line 17: void smsc_del(struct hlr_smsc *smsc);

    Well, this "usual" naming does not apply here: […]

    I modeled this code after the existing one for EUSEs and USSD routes, which - as @fixeria noted - uses _del rather than _free. What is the community consensus here? Should I change my patch to use _free? Should all existing usage of _del in osmo-hlr also be changed to _free?

To view, visit change 34448. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.