Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin, fixeria.
neels has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/27631
)
Change subject: libosmo-pfcp: implement PFCP header and msg handling
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/pfcp/pfcp_msg.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/27631/comment/3415207e_6f0c529f
PS3, Line 44: #define OSMO_LOG_PFCP_MSG_SRC(M, LEVEL, file, line, FMT, ARGS...) do { \
Because in general it doesn't make sense to force
the compiler to generate all that code duplicated […]
on the contrary, if it is a
function implemented in an .o,
then the compiler has less optimization flexibility, IIUC.
I've submitted a separate patch to change it to a va function,
but I still disagree completely with this review,
and I hate that patch, it makes everything worse.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/28239
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/27631
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-upf
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3f85ea052a6b7c064244a8093777e53a47c8c61e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27631
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:03:31 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment