Attention is currently required from: fixeria, pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change by osmith. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/41038?usp=email )
Change subject: gsm48_cc_tx_setup_set_transaction_id: split out
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
File src/libmsc/gsm_04_08_cc.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/41038/comment/d531a250_0f7cd311?usp… :
PS1, Line 845: TX Setup with assigned transaction. This is not allowed
I find this message a bit confusing, maybe say
"transaction ID is already assigned"? […]
done in a separate patch
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/41038/comment/3cfe702f_04097fa2?usp… :
PS1, Line 847: mncc_release_ind(trans->net, trans, trans->callref,
: GSM48_CAUSE_LOC_PRN_S_LU,
: GSM48_CC_CAUSE_RESOURCE_UNAVAIL);
:
Maybe keep this in `gsm48_cc_tx_setup()`? […]
I've considered it, but `gsm48_cc_tx_setup_set_bearer_cap` which gets split out
later also sends `mncc_release_ind` in some (not all!) error code paths. There we
can't also keep `mncc_release_ind` in `gsm48_cc_tx_setup`, so for consistency I'll
keep it in the split-out functions for now. This is probably something that can be
improved in future patches.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/41038?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I715f12d09570211a98b667c56960309bd326e8d8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 41038
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:40:04 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>