Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33123 )
Change subject: encoding: only RFN needed in write_immediate_assignment(_reject)()
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(3 comments)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33123/comment/8f51b9b1_eb286d67
PS1, Line 7: RFN needed in write_immediate_assignment(_reject)()
> I don't understand you here. […]
It doesn't matter, so I prefer passing the more restricted RFN in order to avoid depending on RFN->FN conversion in more places. This makes the implementation more dependent here on how/if we are able to calculate full FNs based on RFN. We get an RFN, and we have to encode so that the RFN can be derived again, so feels less cumbersome having to go through RFN->FN->RFN which may only cause possible issues if there's some FN timing bug.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33123/comment/ffc7eaac_14b6fc99
PS1, Line 12: 10.5.2.30
> 3GPP TS 44. […]
Ack
File src/bts.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33123/comment/d2bc64ee_3b996715
PS1, Line 1121: GSM_TDMA_FN_SUM
> I think you can remove the `GSM_TDMA_FN_SUM` now and simply do: […]
We can have a look at doing this in follow up patches. 21216 being "RFN_MODULUS / 2" is another example on how we are actually dealing with RFNs here instead of requiring full FNs.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33123
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If9b758434c00f2a3868534d5be84946809c989a9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33123
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:21:04 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: neels.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33131 )
Change subject: tdefs; combine timer groups 'ps' and 'cmap' to 'hnbgw'
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33131
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ica6063fae4588b51897e5574d975b3185fa9ae80
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33131
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:12:19 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin, lynxis lazus, matanp.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/32712 )
Change subject: Add FPLMN read and program
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(1 comment)
File pysim-testdata/sysmoUSIM-SJS1.ok:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/32712/comment/48fb5fb9_7ad8370a
PS5, Line 108: 62f201 # MCC: 262 MNC: 010
> The only solution I can see is changing `derive_mcc` and `derive_mnc` to return a 'str' instead of ' […]
I would think so. In general, it's bad practice to use integer for mcc/mnc values exactly for that reason.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/32712
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: pysim
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9ce8c1af691c28ea9ed69e7b5f03f0c02d1f029b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32712
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: matanp <matan1008(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: matanp <matan1008(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:11:29 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Comment-In-Reply-To: matanp <matan1008(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter.
jolly has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32934 )
Change subject: Add support for receiving Bter UI frames at lapdm.c
......................................................................
Patch Set 8:
(1 comment)
File src/gsm/lapdm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32934/comment/6f4f65bc_c1191223
PS8, Line 740: sapi = (msg->l2h[0] >> 2) & 7;
This offset is wrong, because sapi begins after two-byte L1 header. Also see below.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32934
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If04115884743455c7bf2b2bc5f7e49e74b6ffb60
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32934
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:07:43 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: neels.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32989 )
Change subject: add doc/examples/osmo-hnbgw/osmo-hnbgw-cs7.cfg
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
File doc/examples/osmo-hnbgw/osmo-hnbgw-cs7.cfg:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32989/comment/696707b5_c8e33b52
PS2, Line 13: hnbap-allow-tmsi 1
> i think i just copied some other file. […]
Then if in general it makes sense, why not having it by default? Furthermore, if it's default why setting it here in this file aimed at cs7 config showcasing?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32989/comment/6dbc0cc0_7df03d3f
PS2, Line 19: log stderr
> is there a reason? […]
Probably becuse it's the one which is modified the most, at least during debugging :) and also for historical reasons ofc.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32989
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I42c3b434a7339cc3efb27b43c893cfb734de9ca4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32989
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:05:11 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment