Attention is currently required from: pespin, msuraev.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32323 )
Change subject: cnpool: allow separate cs7 for IuPS and IuCS
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(2 comments)
File include/osmocom/hnbgw/hnbgw.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32323/comment/2e47297f_08df39f5
PS8, Line 87: DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hnbgw_context_map_by_conn_id, 6);
> maybe add a comment what's going to be added in here (struct hnbgw_cnlink?).
it would be pretty much exactly the name of the table:
/* hash table of struct hnbgw_context_map by SCCP conn ID */
but ok if it helps i can do it
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32323/comment/8c1542b3_125575af
PS8, Line 133: if (!cnlink->hnbgw_sccp_user)
> can this really happen? Is it expected to happen? I find it confusing when seeing all these checks w […]
In places where it's established to be safe i can just use cnlink->hnbgw_sccp_usser->ss7->sccp directly.
This function's reason to exist is to avoid NULL dereferences.
I want to call this function in *any* godforsaken corner case from early init to late cleanup, and never run into a NULL deref. I want to get the osmo_sccp_instance, or NULL if there isn't any, for whichever weird reason there might be.
In the branch's final state, this function is called in two places:
cnlink_sccp_addr_to_str(): return a string for logging -- if it is early link startup logging there might be no SCCP instance, or anything leading up to the SCCP instance, assigned yet.
tx_reset_ack(): the SCCP link should be stable, but we're in the middle of a RESET operation, so it could be some state transition, and rarely happens. I decided to just do the extra check.
I thought I'd need it more often, but two places is already enough to not dup all these checks.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32323
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iea1824f1c586723d989c80a909bae16bd2866e08
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32323
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 23:49:09 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: neels, msuraev.
Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge, pespin,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32323
to look at the new patch set (#9).
Change subject: cnpool: allow separate cs7 for IuPS and IuCS
......................................................................
cnpool: allow separate cs7 for IuPS and IuCS
Prepare for CN pooling; allow using separate SS7 instances for IuCS and
IuPS.
New struct hnbgw_sccp_user describes a RANAP SCCP user, one per cs7.
Limit struct hnbgw_cnlink to describing a CN peer, using whichever SCCP
instance that is indicated by hnbgw_sccp_user.
Chart sccp.dot shows the changes made.
Related: SYS#6412
Change-Id: Iea1824f1c586723d989c80a909bae16bd2866e08
---
M doc/charts/sccp.dot
M include/osmocom/hnbgw/context_map.h
M include/osmocom/hnbgw/hnbgw.h
M include/osmocom/hnbgw/hnbgw_cn.h
M src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map.c
M src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map_sccp.c
M src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw.c
M src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_cn.c
M src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_rua.c
M src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_vty.c
M src/osmo-hnbgw/osmo_hnbgw_main.c
M tests/config/defaults.vty
M tests/config/one_cs7.vty
M tests/config/one_cs7_with_addrs.vty
M tests/config/one_cs7_with_iucs_addr.vty
M tests/config/one_cs7_with_iups_addr.vty
A tests/config/two_cs7.cfg
A tests/config/two_cs7.vty
A tests/config/two_cs7_with_addrs.cfg
A tests/config/two_cs7_with_addrs.vty
20 files changed, 674 insertions(+), 298 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-hnbgw refs/changes/23/32323/9
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32323
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iea1824f1c586723d989c80a909bae16bd2866e08
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32323
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32915 )
Change subject: immediately SCCP RLSD on HNB re-register
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
File src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map_sccp.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32915/comment/189e85c3_f0b12310
PS1, Line 362: tx_sccp_df1(fi, ranap_msg);
: tx_sccp_rlsd(fi);
> > ok. i'm still a bit unclear, is this about only tx_sccp_rlsd() or also the other one? […]
I ack your point in things being more complex in various corner cases, but I'm poking the SCCP-SCOC specifically to change from a connected state to a release, particularly to initiate the RLSD from here towards the remote CN, now.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32915
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4e78617ad39bb73fe92097c8a1a8069da6a7f6a1
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32915
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 22:51:50 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32989 )
Change subject: add doc/examples/osmo-hnbgw/osmo-hnbgw-cs7.cfg
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
File doc/examples/osmo-hnbgw/osmo-hnbgw-cs7.cfg:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32989/comment/f6b20c28_f446d772
PS2, Line 13: hnbap-allow-tmsi 1
> this line shows as not really interesting in this example? Why not using the default?
i think i just copied some other file.
in general it makes sense to always allow TMSI for HNBAP: we don't even care about HNBAP UE foo at all -- we ACK it but it has zero effect on RANAP where the business happens.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32989/comment/d4172bef_4ae61150
PS2, Line 19: log stderr
> usually we put log sections at the top.
is there a reason?
i figure it is actually the least important bit of config, so why not put it in the bottom...
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32989
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I42c3b434a7339cc3efb27b43c893cfb734de9ca4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32989
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 22:46:05 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32991 )
Change subject: add startup config tests
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(1 comment)
File tests/Makefile.am:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32991/comment/48534468_69a41e9d
PS5, Line 69: $(srcdir)/config/run_tests.sh "$(top_builddir)/src/osmo-hnbgw/osmo-hnbgw" "$(srcdir)/config/" $U
> I fail to see why cannot you add the for loop directly here, I would expect the entire target is run […]
i guess yes, but multiline shell script in a makefile is always kind of ugly, no?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32991
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic8bb30e1dd73753c2ff255566382e241918414f7
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32991
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 22:40:13 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment