Attention is currently required from: osmith.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31547 )
Change subject: bssmap_handle_ass_req_ct_data: implement
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(3 comments)
File src/osmo-bsc/codec_pref.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31547/comment/90e92af4_3dbb1216
PS2, Line 117: gsm0804
gsm0408, not gsm0804. 04.x is radio/Um interface, while 08.x is RAN interfaces like Abis or A.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31547/comment/55208cd2_be556383
PS2, Line 137: sm0804
likewise here, gsm0408. or gsm48 if you want to stay like the enum/constant values.
File src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_bssap.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31547/comment/489b903a_250a7b78
PS2, Line 677: select_codecs_data
FYI, it's not really a 'codec' in the data case, but a "rate". Yes, I understand it may make sense to name it "wrong" to be consistent with other code, but just saying...
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31547
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I350bea15fd2158eb6edc9bc92f2dca48930736e9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31547
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 18:38:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: osmith.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31545 )
Change subject: lchan.h: remove enum lchan_csd_mode
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31545/comment/038dcb2f_1dd2b508
PS2, Line 10: But instead we can just
: directly translate the BSSAP value to the RSL value.
we can, but do we already have a related enum in the ts48_058 header files? After all, a symbolic enum name is much more expressive than some integer values (in the code). The 48.058 split into transparent and non-transparent also makes it slightly more complex to understand, as the uint8_t can have different meanings.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31545
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ice914744da3a2084e82d125848fb69404b8e8a36
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31545
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 18:33:44 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment