Attention is currently required from: neels, fixeria, lynxis lazus.
pespin has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29788
)
Change subject: Add BTS setup ramping to prevent BSC overloading
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(2 comments)
File src/osmo-bsc/nm_bb_transc_fsm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29788/comment/8ba653ee_75e66ea9
PS1, Line 345: case NM_EV_RAMP_GO:
I've implemented it together with a libosmocore
(ignore_invalid_event_mask). […]
I don't see why you'd need to add it in all
FSM states. If the object is ENABLED that means the configuration already went one and
hence how it is possible that the outside code send this event to allow start of
configuration?
File src/osmo-bsc/nm_bts_fsm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29788/comment/496f7252_60093b0c
PS1, Line 92: struct gsm_bts *bts,
IMHO this is fine. last example of 6.2) looks the
same. […]
You could check all the other configure_loop() functions and use the same
format as in all of them ;)
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29788
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id56dde6d58f3d0d20352f6c306598d2cccc6345d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29788
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:40:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment