Attention is currently required from: pespin, fixeria.
dexter has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341
)
Change subject: pcu_l1_if_phy: flexible phy access
......................................................................
Patch Set 8:
(2 comments)
File src/osmobts_sock.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341/comment/e88a4bad_0a0ff8b0
PS5, Line 115: bts->trx[trx].fl1h = NULL;
If you want to make it mandatory for any driver to
implement that function then yes it's fine
One could argue if there may be a
driver in the future that does not require to be closed but I think this is mandatory. At
least at the moment all drivers implement such a function.
File src/pcu_l1_if.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341/comment/bc5b8af9_e09cf835
PS5, Line 218: the_pcu->phy_ops->l1if_pdch_req(bts->trx[trx].fl1h, ts, 0, fn,
arfcn, block_nr,
Again, this makes this function mandatory to be
implemented by the driver.
l1if_pdch_req() is an integral part of the driver
concept, its definitely needed by every driver.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8692d1bd5d137a17cf596ee2914722f419c9978d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31341
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:58:35 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment