Attention is currently required from: dexter. pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896 ) Change subject: abis_om2000: duplicate nmstate of bb_trxc mo to trx mo ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (8 comments) Commit Message: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896/comment/1252bd37_30f85a79 PS1, Line 9: In OM2000 a separate bb_trxc MO does not exist to archive better "does not exit. To achive" Missing dot Typo in "archive". https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896/comment/78831608_250a8938 PS1, Line 10: compatibilty towards classic ABIS and its MOs lets mirror the nmstate of Abis let's https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896/comment/a2281b72_281f9b6d PS1, Line 11: the trx MO to the trxc_mo to make it look like if it were present. BB_TRANSC MO to the RCARRIER MO File src/osmo-bsc/abis_om2000.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896/comment/6d4c3908_f1552f05 PS1, Line 1011: switch (mo_state) { Move this to a function: mo2nm_state(uint8_t mo_state). Then, "nsd.new_state.availability = mo2nm_state(mo_state);" https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896/comment/ddc40cab_4bccd52d PS1, Line 1032: duplicate_trxc_nm_state(bts, mo); This looks wrong, you should emit signals for both NM objects not only one? You could do something like this after emitting the signal: if (mo->class == OM2K_MO_CLS_TRXC) { struct gsm_nm_state *bbtransc_nm_state = nm_state = &trx->bb_transc.mo.nm_state; /* Update current state before emitting signal: */ bbtransc_nm_state->availability = nsd.new_state.availability; osmo_signal_dispatch(SS_NM, S_NM_STATECHG, &nsd); } https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896/comment/eb830fe4_207f08a6 PS1, Line 1058: duplicate_trxc_nm_state(bts, mo); Same, simply explicitly set bb_transc_nm_state->operational = new_state.operational; https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896/comment/ea0e51bd_1294e48c PS1, Line 1059: } Not directly related to this patch but indirectly related to have stuff working as expected: AFAICT you are missing a "osmo_signal_dispatch(SS_NM, S_NM_STATECHG, &nsd);" here. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896/comment/06e4ee92_b9d2332c PS1, Line 2245: otfp->trx->bb_transc.mo.nm_state.administrative = NM_STATE_UNLOCKED; Not directly related to this patch but indirectly related to have stuff working as expected: AFAICT you are missing a "osmo_signal_dispatch(SS_NM, S_NM_STATECHG, &nsd);" here. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28896 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I4611d8af16a30725308bd527098b12a356bfde9f Gerrit-Change-Number: 28896 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 13:57:48 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment