[S] Change in osmo-pcu[master]: tbf_dl_fsm: Fix '{FLOW}: Event ASSIGN_PCUIF_CNF not permitted'

pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33530 ) Change subject: tbf_dl_fsm: Fix '{FLOW}: Event ASSIGN_PCUIF_CNF not permitted' ...................................................................... tbf_dl_fsm: Fix '{FLOW}: Event ASSIGN_PCUIF_CNF not permitted' As seen during manual testing: 20230628140439674 DTBF tbf_dl.cpp:116 MS(IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d:TA-0:MSCLS-12-12) Allocating DL TBF ... 20230628140439674 DTBFDL tbf_dl.cpp:489 DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){NEW}: Received Event ASSIGN_ADD_CCCH 20230628140439674 DTBFDL bts.cpp:1108 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){ASSIGN} Tx CCCH (PCH) Immediate Assignment [PktDlAss=PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5)] TA=0 ... 20230628140440238 DMS pdch.cpp:681 MS(IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d:TA-0:MSCLS-12-12:DL): + rcv_resource_request: now used by 2 (tbf,rcv_resource_request) 20230628140440238 DTBFDL pdch.cpp:738 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){ASSIGN} Got PACKET RESOURCE REQ while DL-TBF pending, killing it 20230628140440238 DTBF tbf.cpp:271 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){ASSIGN} free ... 20230628140440377 DTBFUL tbf_ul_fsm.c:169 UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW 20230628140440377 DTBF tbf_dl.cpp:116 MS(IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d:TA-0:MSCLS-12-12:UL) Allocating DL TBF 20230628140440377 DTBFDL tbf_dl.cpp:475 DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){NEW}: Received Event ASSIGN_ADD_PACCH 20230628140440387 DTBF tbf_dl_ass_fsm.c:105 TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){FLOW} start Packet Downlink Assignment (PACCH) for TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){ASSIGN} ... 20230628140440816 DTBFDL bts.cpp:737 DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){FLOW}: Received Event ASSIGN_PCUIF_CNF 20230628140440816 DTBFDL bts.cpp:737 DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:IMSI-901700000015256:TLLI-0xd4d57c9d){FLOW}: Event ASSIGN_PCUIF_CNF not permitted Change-Id: I042b0117552acae25c750e762f5cc254399da64f --- M src/tbf_dl_fsm.c 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Approvals: osmith: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve Jenkins Builder: Verified laforge: Looks good to me, approved fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve diff --git a/src/tbf_dl_fsm.c b/src/tbf_dl_fsm.c index d604f6f..8d95d14 100644 --- a/src/tbf_dl_fsm.c +++ b/src/tbf_dl_fsm.c @@ -213,6 +213,20 @@ struct tbf_dl_fsm_ctx *ctx = (struct tbf_dl_fsm_ctx *)fi->priv; switch (event) { + case TBF_EV_ASSIGN_PCUIF_CNF: + if (!(ctx->state_flags & (1 << GPRS_RLCMAC_FLAG_CCCH))) { + /* This can happen if we initiated a CCCH DlAss from an + * older TBF object (same TLLI) towards BTS, and the DL-TBF + * was recreated (this one) and was successfully assigned over PACCH. + * This is usually the case if MS requests 2phase access + * to get an UL TBF while we were waiting for a DL TBF + * assignment for that same MS over PCH. + */ + LOGPTBFDL(ctx->dl_tbf, LOGL_INFO, + "Ignoring event ASSIGN_PCUIF_CNF from BTS " + "(CCCH was not requested on current assignment)\n"); + } + break; case TBF_EV_DL_ACKNACK_MISS: /* DL TBF: we missed a DL ACK/NACK. If we started assignment * over CCCH and never received any DL ACK/NACK yet, it means we @@ -437,6 +451,7 @@ }, [TBF_ST_FLOW] = { .in_event_mask = + X(TBF_EV_ASSIGN_PCUIF_CNF) | X(TBF_EV_DL_ACKNACK_MISS) | X(TBF_EV_LAST_DL_DATA_SENT) | X(TBF_EV_MAX_N3105), -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33530 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I042b0117552acae25c750e762f5cc254399da64f Gerrit-Change-Number: 33530 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: pespin &lt;pespin(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria &lt;vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge &lt;laforge(a)osmocom.org&gt; Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith &lt;osmith(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin &lt;pespin(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-MessageType: merged