Attention is currently required from: laforge, fixeria.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/30743 )
Change subject: {trxcon,virt_phy}: shared GPRS L1 (MAC) implementation
......................................................................
Patch Set 11:
(2 comments)
File src/shared/l1gprs.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/30743/comment/7298da8c_73f50d87
PS10, Line 111: if (tbf->uplink) {
Again sounds like you could perfectly have 2
functions. […]
No, I don't want to have two 90% identical structs.
The only difference between them is presence of the `dl_tfi` field.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/30743/comment/e576592b_16b3c562
PS10, Line 294: l1gprs_register_tbf(gprs, tbf);
I think it may be good to always first unregister, and
if != 0x00, also register. […]
I was thinking about this. But is it possible on
practice that you need to modify a TBF? I mean, you always get a new TBF with different
parameters from the network, there is no protocol level message to modify an existing TBF,
is there?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/30743
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmocom-bb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9567d64f9d00262e36147e8d7e541e5e246bda5f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30743
Gerrit-PatchSet: 11
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:35:07 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment