Attention is currently required from: dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174
)
Change subject: pcu_l1_if: receive E1 connection parameters
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(12 comments)
File src/pcu_l1_if.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/56eee3e7_3f6363d3
PS1, Line 34: struct gsm_e1_subslot;
where does this come from? #include <osmocom/abis/e1_input.h>? better include it if
its coming from a dependency library.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/f989a22e_7686b91f
PS1, Line 182: int pcu_l1if_get_ccu_conn_pars(struct gsm_e1_subslot *e1_link, uint8_t
pdch_ts, uint8_t pdch_trx_no);
please keep same param names other functions. None has the pdch_ prefix.
File src/pcu_l1_if.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/0d56e7dc_23dd37dc
PS1, Line 77: uint8_t trx_no;
"trx_no" but "ts", let's better standarize variable names please.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/2dad1c76_dedbcaa0
PS1, Line 81: struct gsm_e1_subslot e1_link;
type is subslot but name is link? this looks weird tbh.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/d0b2c0bc_bcacf08d
PS1, Line 84: static LLIST_HEAD(e1_ccu_table);
some comment describing this wuld be welcome.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/28440884_e5c689cb
PS1, Line 981: int pcu_l1if_get_ccu_conn_pars(struct gsm_e1_subslot *e1_link, uint8_t
pdch_ts, uint8_t pdch_trx_no)
trx should go before ts.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/5de5c980_a029a09d
PS1, Line 987: memcpy(e1_link, &e1_ccu_conn_pars->e1_link, sizeof(*e1_link));
this looks a bit weird. Why copying the content if you can provide a const pointer to it?
pass "const struct gsm_e1_subslot **e1_link" or similar?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/d44bc411_ea85d64d
PS1, Line 992: LOGP(DL1IF, LOGL_ERROR, "(PDCH-TS:%u, TRX:%u) cannot find E1
connection parameters for CCU\n", pdch_ts,
This logging prefixes are not following any existing format in any osmocom code afaict.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/9dc8268d_e9fbe199
PS1, Line 1003: if (e1_ccu_ind->e1_ts_ss == 255) {
don't we have defined for all these numbers?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/4c680978_887e3a38
PS1, Line 1012: "(PDCH-TS:%u, TRX:%u) new E1 CCU communication parameters for
CCU (E1-line:%u, E1-TS:%u, E1-SS:%u, rate:%ukbps)\n",
same, prefix formatting.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/6d63fbb1_e3f49758
PS1, Line 1017: llist_for_each_entry(e1_ccu_conn_pars, &e1_ccu_table, entry) {
If you passed a pointer to the pcu_l1if_get_ccu_conn_pars() above you could get a pointer
to e1_ccu_conn_pars and don't need to use a loop here.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174/comment/f30b4a36_2d20e748
PS1, Line 1027: e1_ccu_conn_pars = talloc_zero(tall_pcu_ctx, struct e1_ccu_conn_pars);
You can probably move this into an _alloc() function.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31174
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1f926b023205a9ecf78d8a8586d6ac21cc73eb0a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31174
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 16:33:53 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment