Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin, daniel, lynxis lazus.
keith has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/16808
)
Change subject: Add vty `reject-cause` to set the reject cause
......................................................................
Patch Set 11:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS11:
and I'm not against keeping the functionality
clean, and I'm all for questioning the need for patche […]
This also would not
be the first time that a feature that is entirely (even it it were so)
investigation/testing based was included in mainstream osmo
I wonder what does a commercial HLR look like, I mean there are quite some LU reject
causes. osmo-hlr uses ONE of them, hard coded. Maybe it's one of those things in the
spec where options kept getting added, but really there's only one or two in use.
Probably not the HLRs decision anyway?
When would an operator decide between #12 and #15 for example? For me it's quite hard
to see form the spec what the intention is as to have the MS behaviour differs between
them.
The difference between "forbidden location areas for regional provision of
service" and "forbidden location areas for roaming" seems subtle, as does
the difference between "shall perform a cell selection" and "shall search
for a suitable cell in another location area" - given that the LAI was added to the
forbidden list.
Maybe #15 is never intended for use when a SIM attempts to connect to it's HOME
network. I guess that kind of thing could be automatic in the code;
Is the IMSI "ours"? -> then #12 else #15
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/16808
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hlr
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Icea39020c23fbbea9e92847df76af8986fdbf48a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16808
Gerrit-PatchSet: 11
Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: keith <keith(a)rhizomatica.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:52:46 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: keith <keith(a)rhizomatica.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment