Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin, fixeria. osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/29353 )
Change subject: osmux: Use local/remote CID terminology ......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(5 comments)
File common/chapters/osmux/mgcp_extension_osmux.adoc:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/29353/comment/d3a1cdc1_ab920... PS1, Line 46: original _remote CID_ sent during `CRCX`. The same way, all `MDCX` response shall
"MGW's remote CID" to clarify beyond doubt ... […]
Done
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/29353/comment/9398f632_ebd3b... PS1, Line 75: MGW's <<remote CID>>
if this was recvCID before, it should now either be MGW's local CID or peer's remote CID according t […]
Done
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/29353/comment/b2daad41_8ae65... PS1, Line 75: .Example: response to `CRCX` containing the MGW's <<remote CID>>
are you sure a space in a reference link works? […]
Done
File common/chapters/osmux/osmux.adoc:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/29353/comment/c290fb12_addc5... PS1, Line 55: frames the local
sentence lost meaning
still unresolved
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/29353/comment/e19443c3_31e70... PS1, Line 55: send Osmux frames the
"send Osmux frames to the"? (missing "to")
still unresolved