Attention is currently required from: neels, laforge.
pespin has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/28816 )
Change subject: add ps_rab_ass FSM to map GTP via UPF
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/hnbgw/hnbgw.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/28816/comment/6f1e3d4a_970dc740
PS2, Line 193: /* Return true when the user configured GTP mapping to be enabled, by
configuring a PFCP link to a UPF.
I'm not following you, pau. […]
I we should
not allow running osmo-hnbgw without proxying GTP through it (in detail, through its
associated UPF).
I am referring to the problem described for the need of a GTP-u proxy in the SGSN in
OS#5154 and SYS#5389, SYS#5435. You also referenced a need for it in osmo-hnbgw in the
decription of the task this commit is about (OS#5153).
I think the main issue in this case would be what's described in SYS#5435 case
"B]": "SGSN sending to nano3G GGSN's TEI which is changing after
UpdatePDPCtxResp" but this time applied to HNBGW and hNodeB.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/28816
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic9bc30f322c4c6c6e82462d1da50cb15b336c63a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28816
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:25:49 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment