Change in osmo-pcu[master]: pcuif_proto: rename PCU_IF_SAPI_AGCH_DT to PCU_IF_SAPI_PCH_DT

Attention is currently required from: dexter. pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31156 ) Change subject: pcuif_proto: rename PCU_IF_SAPI_AGCH_DT to PCU_IF_SAPI_PCH_DT ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) File include/osmocom/pcu/pcuif_proto.h: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31156/comment/d34c3770_c85d9308 PS1, Line 42: #define PCU_IF_SAPI_PCH_DT 0x08 /* assignment on PCH (confirmed using TLLI) */ Ok, so there are 2 methods. Is it really necessary to have 2 methods? to support and maintain 2 methods? Can we use one method or another and deprecate the other one? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31156 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I6dfb8035134bc85a025415bd6c2f9c01987d9268 Gerrit-Change-Number: 31156 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 13:43:50 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment