Attention is currently required from: pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc-nat/+/27470 )
Change subject: bsc_nat_sccp_inst: local_sccp_addr -> addr
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/bsc_nat/bsc_nat.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc-nat/+/27470/comment/bbee2312_1d1a38a2
PS1, Line 28: struct osmo_sccp_addr addr; /* OsmoBSCNAT's local address */
Maybe loc_addr or local_addr would be more intuitive
when reading code.
I've used addr in other places too in later patches in this
patchset, IMHO it is nicely consistent and short:
sccp_inst->addr
subscr_conn->bsc->addr
subscr_conn->msc->addr
Since there is no other address for the sccp_inst it should be clear that it's the
local address. Also there's the comment in case it's not clear.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc-nat/+/27470
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc-nat
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3083374d589487ed960507e7a431c45914afc5dd
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27470
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 12:35:11 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment