pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/26717 )
Change subject: amr: Introduce APIs to convert BE to IuUP/IuFP format
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/26717/2/src/amr.c
File src/amr.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/26717/2/src/amr.c@264
PS2, Line 264: int i;
> Consistency with osmo_amr_bwe_to_iuup(): unsigned.
It doesn't need to be consistent because the loop is totally different. In any case, I uses int i here because I initially whent up to 0 when writting it,and I wanted to avoid a similar bug to the one I recently introduced :)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/26717
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id2bd32d5f2060abe581730996dc4251381bf7d4f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 26717
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 13:43:01 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/26716 )
Change subject: export osmo_amr_bits
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
> Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
>
> it's not really exporting anything, it's just adding a declaration for an existing export?
Yes well, but usually no one knows about a function being exported unless you check the header file :)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/26716
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic03653b2a885c5d9419c6c75a718b550fc30b86e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 26716
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 13:41:30 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/26651 )
Change subject: mgcp_client: add new codec IUFP as VND.3GPP.IUFP
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(1 comment)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/26651/5/src/libosmo-mgcp-client/mgc…
File src/libosmo-mgcp-client/mgcp_client.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/26651/5/src/libosmo-mgcp-client/mgc…
PS5, Line 62: { CODEC_IUFP, "VND.3GPP.IUFP/16000" },
> So far we use upper case everywhere. however in theory this code is called IuFP. […]
Why do you say it's called IuFP? See 3GPP TS 29.414 6.3.3.5 "Media Attributes":
"""
The following media attribute shall be supplied: “a=rtpmap:<dynamic payload number> VND.3GPP.IUFP/16000”,
where :<dynamic payload number> is the same dynamic payload type number as in the above media announcement
<fmt list>.
"""
It's true though that 6.3 says:
"""
NOTE: The IuFP is registered with IANA as the MIME type ”VND.3GPP.IuFP”of the ”audio” category,
however, this registration does not preclude the use of IuFP to transport ”data”.
"""
But the one in case in section 6.3.3.5 seems to be more similar to what's needed by SDP, so I'd go for all caps.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/26651
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-mgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifd1210a897743396899f34457c96e6fd2109c6b3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 26651
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 13:39:43 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/25432 )
Change subject: Add multithreading for the virtual trunk
......................................................................
Patch Set 37:
> Patch Set 37:
>
> no follow-up for two weeks?
ping?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/25432
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-mgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I31be8253600c8af0a43c967d0d128f5ba7b16260
Gerrit-Change-Number: 25432
Gerrit-PatchSet: 37
Gerrit-Owner: Hoernchen <ewild(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 13:34:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26617 )
Change subject: bsc: make perform_clear() work when VTY is not initialized
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26617/1/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn
File bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26617/1/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn@…
PS1, Line 1069: if (g_vty_initialized) {
> Can we simply have this check in f_logp()?
good idea!
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26617
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8116075f32937bd06ba14b426010bf6fec2ef402
Gerrit-Change-Number: 26617
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 13:33:54 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment