Attention is currently required from: laforge.
dexter has posted comments on this change by dexter. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/39199?usp=email )
Change subject: global_platform: add new command "install_cap"
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS5:
> I'ts great that you're adding a separate tutorial, but I think in addition to that you also need to […]
Done
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/39199?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: pysim
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6cbd37f0fad5579b20e83c27349bd5acc129e6d0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39199
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 15:01:38 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcap/+/39324?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#5).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Verified-1 by Jenkins Builder
Change subject: server: Use osmo_stream_srv_link on tcp listen socket
......................................................................
server: Use osmo_stream_srv_link on tcp listen socket
Related: SYS#7080
Change-Id: I3562185f98685ea5a412273212e6dfbe55b360e2
---
M configure.ac
M contrib/jenkins.sh
M contrib/osmo-pcap.spec.in
M debian/control
M include/osmo-pcap/osmo_pcap_server.h
M src/Makefile.am
M src/osmo_server_core.c
M src/osmo_server_network.c
M tests/rotate_localtime/Makefile.am
9 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcap refs/changes/24/39324/5
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcap/+/39324?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcap
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3562185f98685ea5a412273212e6dfbe55b360e2
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39324
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcap/+/39324?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#4).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Code-Review+1 by laforge, Verified-1 by Jenkins Builder
Change subject: server: Use osmo_stream_srv_link on tcp listen socket
......................................................................
server: Use osmo_stream_srv_link on tcp listen socket
Related: SYS#7080
Change-Id: I3562185f98685ea5a412273212e6dfbe55b360e2
---
M configure.ac
M contrib/jenkins.sh
M debian/control
M include/osmo-pcap/osmo_pcap_server.h
M src/Makefile.am
M src/osmo_server_core.c
M src/osmo_server_network.c
M tests/rotate_localtime/Makefile.am
8 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcap refs/changes/24/39324/4
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcap/+/39324?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcap
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3562185f98685ea5a412273212e6dfbe55b360e2
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39324
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: laforge, lynxis lazus, pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change by lynxis lazus. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490?usp=email )
Change subject: vlr: add PS support
......................................................................
Patch Set 5: Code-Review+1
(14 comments)
Patchset:
PS5:
just some cosmetic and maintainability comments.
File src/libvlr/vlr_lu_fsm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/7abdc8f4_c58932b8?usp… :
PS5, Line 357: *!
about the doxygen format comment:
the `/*!` is in the wrong place here.
To be associated with the 'N' member, a `/*! ... */` doxygen comment needs to go above the item.
For inline commenting, you need to use `/*< ... */` instead.
(no need to use doxygen IMHO, and IMHO comments above are in general nicer than inline ones, less clutter in future editing.)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/9963069f_44d3e2b1?usp… :
PS5, Line 569: static void vlr_lu_compl_fsm_reset_n(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t prev_state)
> I'll copy the same code in here then. […]
I think this does not need to change -- this function is called for multiple different FSM onenter events, so there is no single accurate name.
So I think the naming is actually chosen well.
We could have three individually named my_state_name_onenter() functions and each of them calls the non-duplicated vlr_lu_compl_fsm_reset_n() function. That would be ultra perfect but given the short function body, this is clearly clutter, which is also a thing to aviod.
All in all this is an even steven, on a purely cosmetic item, and i would just leave the patch as it is.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/08254f62_88407a50?usp… :
PS5, Line 587: return 1;
(personally i prefer incrementing on a separate code line, for more trivial code clarity)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/1b4bc96b_414fde38?usp… :
PS5, Line 589: LOGPFSML(fi, LOGL_ERROR, "LU Compl timeout %d / %d\n", fi->T, lcvp->N);
let's have "T%d / N%d"
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/3217ef09_af7c2e47?usp… :
PS5, Line 598: break;
(we often have a default: OSMO_ASSERT(false) in these to ensure we notice enum bugs)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/fb26f96e_e605c48a?usp… :
PS5, Line 771: /*! count times timer T timed out */
(maybe: "count nr of times that timer...")
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/e19badc2_afbf9456?usp… :
PS5, Line 1437: static void lu_fsm_reset_n(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t prev_state)
> Acknowledged
i agree with pau here because it is only one FSM state's onenter action
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/2f512e72_c77a3092?usp… :
PS5, Line 1570: {
(would be nice to have a short one-liner comment to indicate what this does / why it needs to go in the rather unusual _preterm())
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/4331c108_c82d930f?usp… :
PS5, Line 1582: RVIV
a libosmocore typo?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/66157004_af050256?usp… :
PS5, Line 1586: gsm48_cause = GSM48_REJECT_NETWORK_FAILURE;
(add "break;" in the end)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/22e5df51_1de64d5a?usp… :
PS5, Line 1597: mian
typo
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/364b8e8e_e12b4583?usp… :
PS5, Line 1611: fi->T
technically, middle arg should be 0 or -1 or so, because vlr_is_cs() == false from above.
(btw, i wonder a bit why it is necessary to pass two args to vlr_timer_secs(), still waiting for the caller that passes two distinct values. the patch adding the second arg is already merged.)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490/comment/dc8d3532_034439a0?usp… :
PS5, Line 1742:
(two blank lines, unusual for osmocom)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38490?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie9ffeb140c9d354b3a0f4822e2619f623235add0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38490
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 14:31:40 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Attention is currently required from: laforge.
falconia has posted comments on this change by falconia. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/39308?usp=email )
Change subject: add dependency on libosmovty
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
> I would suggest to merge this into the actual commit that makes use of libosmovty. […]
That was how I had it originally, but then I thought that dependency additions should be factored out and made very explicit. But if both you and @pespin@sysmocom.de prefer it the other way, I'll go back to the way I had it originally.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/39308?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I57cb919891e5c7ee0f828b98af11199cd9c123f8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39308
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 14:25:54 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
Hello laforge,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcap/+/39326?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#2).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Code-Review+1 by laforge
Change subject: server: Log unable to figure out pcap vs pcapng
......................................................................
server: Log unable to figure out pcap vs pcapng
Change-Id: I110456f142cab88ba9d51409b66d66cf093adb9f
---
M src/osmo_server_network.c
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcap refs/changes/26/39326/2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcap/+/39326?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcap
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I110456f142cab88ba9d51409b66d66cf093adb9f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39326
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: lynxis lazus.
neels has posted comments on this change by lynxis lazus. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38488?usp=email )
Change subject: vlr: extend the subscriber invalidate callback with reasons
......................................................................
Patch Set 5: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38488/comment/9db0eaec_dddc7a71?usp… :
PS5, Line 10: There are multiple cases when this happens:
(maybe a good idea too add this very useful list in the api doc comment for the callback)
File include/osmocom/vlr/vlr.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38488/comment/0643a0a8_eb8d2369?usp… :
PS5, Line 253:
(maybe good to describe the meaning of the cancel_by_update argument)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/38488?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie5b687318b106a230fcee52deba86649641004b3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38488
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:22 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes