Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change by fixeria. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38037?usp=email )
Change subject: s1gw: add TC_pfcp_heartbeat
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
File s1gw/S1GW_Tests.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38037/comment/2424ba62_da36… :
PS2, Line 330: rts := f_pfcp_get_recovery_timestamp();
See my comment from last patch, you are also getting the value here, so you could have passed it to f_ConnHdlr_register_pfcp() above.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38037/comment/c6d8e0b8_f2e4… :
PS2, Line 336: f_ConnHdlr_pfcp_expect(tr_PFCP_Heartbeat_Resp);
(this function should probably return the actually received value matching the template.)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38037?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iadb24c2c346a62aa8b59d24475e71f683fc3dfe6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38037
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 12:19:35 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change by fixeria. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38040?usp=email )
Change subject: s1gw: send the actual Recovery Time Stamp
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
(1 comment)
File s1gw/S1GW_ConnHdlr.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38040/comment/b472a354_7d85… :
PS1, Line 242: f_pfcp_get_recovery_timestamp()));
It probably makes more sense to pass this value as a param of f_pfcp_handle_assoc_setup_req(), so that it only needs to be fetched once at the start of the test, avoiding unnecessary extra ping pong messages?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38040?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I350d28289526d8264ef9b70e796ef76ee7fcbb4b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38040
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 12:18:13 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change by fixeria. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38031?usp=email )
Change subject: hnbgw: move vc_PFCP from ConnHdlr to test_CT
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS2:
I guess this happens because pfcp module doesn't yet have its own ConnHdlr iirc, and he probably moves the existing port to the main CT so that then it will subclass the test ConnDHlr from the newly created PFCP ConnHdlr.
Just assuming all that, without actually having seen it yet, let's see. I agree it lacks some context.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38031?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaf7a54c674f2dc549572d918beb6f355f48ee700
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38031
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 12:10:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Attention is currently required from: fixeria, lynxis lazus.
pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/37924?usp=email )
Change subject: s1ap_proxy: Support replying errors
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS4:
> I did not expect my request to trigger such an emotional burst..
Maybe because it's not the first time I'm seeing this (not specifically from you) and each time it sums up.
> TBH, I still don't see how the metrics patch depends on this one and why are they both in the same patch set.
Because since both patches are of considerable span, having them in independent branches may also create conflicts duplicating the amount of work needed.
And because I was not expecting my patch to be trapped here for more than a week.
> but got swallowed by ...
Yes, I too get swallwed by other stuff, and yet it seems this doesn't affect your patches getting merged while it actually affects mine.
> I am working less hours then you.
Does that imply your patches get higher preference than mine? because it has been clarified that testing is not a real reason comapring to your patches.
You could have merged mine and worked on top of mine, like I usually do with yours, because I consider this helps everybody.
> If you wish, I can take care of this patch, i.e. keep rebasing it and add testing coverage.
> Let it be my problem then, allowing you to focus on other features.
You are not getting it. I don't want it to be my problem, I don't either want it to be your problem, I don't either want it to be a problem for anybody.
Having this merged should allow *everybody* to have a shared code base to work on, without *everybody* having to maintain extra patches on their own branches. Because then, *everybody* is losing time with it.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/37924?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: erlang/osmo-s1gw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I242e84fb09b00f4794b6e1aa770f348a0e60aea4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37924
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 12:05:39 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: fixeria, neels.
laforge has posted comments on this change by neels. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/37994?usp=email )
Change subject: coverity CID#272968 CID#272939
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File src/sccp.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/37994/comment/061d627e_407c2608… :
PS1, Line 167: return 0;
> Ah, here is a hint. […]
I'll try to look at the code soon-ish and see what might be the right way to proceed.
According to Tabel 1/Q.712 there are quite a numer of messages with multiple optional parameters. For example, in CR, there might be importance, credit, hop_counter, user_data, calling_party_address (and the obvious end_of_opt).
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/37994?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sccp
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic6823cf077ef15ef1f6e209bf53384913911f93e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37994
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:36:58 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>