osmith has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ci/+/34455?usp=email )
Change subject: OBS: add git tag pattern for wireshark
......................................................................
OBS: add git tag pattern for wireshark
Since previous patch 62693be1 ("OBS: fix generating wrong limesuite
version"), the scripts rely on having the correct pattern for the tag
in the config. Add the pattern for wireshark.
Fix for:
fatal: No tags can describe '6d412b991d8c2f50b7854611b1a9ef567bab9962'.
Change-Id: Ic8e83b4d5d897cb6b94b04b1232486288f3a1f9b
---
M scripts/obs/lib/config.py
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Approvals:
fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
Jenkins Builder: Verified
pespin: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/scripts/obs/lib/config.py b/scripts/obs/lib/config.py
index 3a3e9ad..3b2518f 100644
--- a/scripts/obs/lib/config.py
+++ b/scripts/obs/lib/config.py
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
git_latest_tag_pattern_other = {
"limesuite": "^v[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*$",
"open5gs": "^v[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*$",
+ "wireshark": "^v[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*\\.[0-9a-z]*$",
}
docker_distro_default = "debian:12"
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ci/+/34455?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ci
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic8e83b4d5d897cb6b94b04b1232486288f3a1f9b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34455
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Attention is currently required from: falconia.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34449?usp=email )
Change subject: SMS over GSUP: implement forwarding of MO SMS
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File src/hlr_sms.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34449/comment/e10b85a1_92d03ba9
PS2, Line 136: char smsc_addr[21];
> I am not able to find a definition for maximum SMSC-address length anywhere in libosmocore headers.
libsmpp34/src/smpp34_structs.h
31:#define ADDRESS_LENGTH 21
Though that may be from SMPP 3.4 specifications, not GSM whatever specifics (though they may be related). So up to you, but it probably makes sense to just use the ADDERSS_LENGTH from libsmpp34 there?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34449?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hlr
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaad4531922c41583d261c79f42561a1bdbe03521
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34449
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:15:03 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: falconia, fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448?usp=email )
Change subject: SMS over GSUP: implement vty config of SMSC routing
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/hlr/hlr_sms.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448/comment/c3f853fa_dd6d58db
PS2, Line 17: void smsc_del(struct hlr_smsc *smsc);
> I modeled this code after the existing one for EUSEs and USSD routes, which - as @fixeria noted - us […]
My opinion is that in 88% of the code we use alloc+free, so in general those named _del should be moved to _free (as long as they can be considered free function as per what they do).
Semantics of free functions for object pointers are clear. They get a nullable heap allocated pointer and free it together with all fields/subobjects.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/34448?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hlr
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1624dcd9d22b4efca965ccdd1c74f0063a94a33c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34448
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:13:01 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment