Attention is currently required from: dexter.
Hello Jenkins Builder, pespin,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/33831
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: requirements: add pyshark to requirements lists
......................................................................
requirements: add pyshark to requirements lists
pySim-trace.py requires pyshark, let's add it to the requirement lists
Related: OS#6094
Change-Id: I885c7210aac3774a5f1f5201903ad2bff94c3120
---
M README.md
M requirements.txt
M setup.py
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/pysim refs/changes/31/33831/2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/33831
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: pysim
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I885c7210aac3774a5f1f5201903ad2bff94c3120
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33831
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
dexter has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/33837 )
Change subject: apdu/ts_102_221: extract channel number from dict before calling del_lchan
......................................................................
apdu/ts_102_221: extract channel number from dict before calling del_lchan
When the method del_lchan is called, closed_channel_nr still contains a dict
that contains the channel number under the key 'logical_channel_number'.
This will lead to an exception. We must extact the channel number from
the dict before we can use it with del_lchan. (See also
created_channel_nr)
Related: OS#6094
Change-Id: I399856bc227f17b66cdb4158a69a35d50ba222a7
---
M pySim/apdu/ts_102_221.py
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/pysim refs/changes/37/33837/1
diff --git a/pySim/apdu/ts_102_221.py b/pySim/apdu/ts_102_221.py
index 3780c8a..2d3ad82 100644
--- a/pySim/apdu/ts_102_221.py
+++ b/pySim/apdu/ts_102_221.py
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@
self.col_id = '%02u' % created_channel_nr
return {'mode': mode, 'created_channel': created_channel_nr }
elif mode == 'close_channel':
- closed_channel_nr = self.cmd_dict['p2']
+ closed_channel_nr = self.cmd_dict['p2']['logical_channel_number']
rs.del_lchan(closed_channel_nr)
self.col_id = '%02u' % closed_channel_nr
return {'mode': mode, 'closed_channel': closed_channel_nr }
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/33837
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: pysim
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I399856bc227f17b66cdb4158a69a35d50ba222a7
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33837
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Attention is currently required from: jolly, fixeria, dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33448 )
Change subject: ASCI: Add Notification/FACCH support
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(5 comments)
File src/common/rsl.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33448/comment/07b0d121_fc069430
PS6, Line 816: * the call is active. Most MSs in dedicated mode may not be able to receive the NCH instead.
s/instead/otherwise/
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33448/comment/5a1624d2_00e3e061
PS6, Line 820: uint8_t chan_desc_len, int count)
unsigned count
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33448/comment/199095e1_45f66374
PS6, Line 826: int tn, ln, n;
all these can be unsigned
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33448/comment/89be0c0a_69679fa7
PS6, Line 837: if (lchan->type != GSM_LCHAN_SDCCH
isn't there an lchan_is_dedicated() or alike?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33448/comment/8c66d0cb_5e6b495a
PS6, Line 845: msgb_tl16v_put(msg, RSL_IE_L3_INFO, sizeof(notif), (uint8_t *) ¬if);
can you explain a bit more all this loop with the extra call after it?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33448
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3ed14fa54a907891e492a7ada8e745a2c56cd46d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33448
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:53:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: jolly.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33833 )
Change subject: ASCI: Enable UPLINK ACCESS on various BTS models
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
I see this conditions "(lchan->ho.active == HANDOVER_ENABLED) || rsl_chan_rt_is_asci(lchan->rsl_chan_rt)" being used in different places and contexts, and it is not directly clear what's the meaning behind that check. It may make sense to have it as a static inline or define? as in "bool lchan_foobar(lchan)".
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33833
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iae0db6bfcf6629c114436a79648e832c82835abe
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33833
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:47:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33829 )
Change subject: pcu_sock: forward downlink IMMEDAITE ASSIGNMENT to AGCH
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33829/comment/e0b8ee95_dbee07b5
PS2, Line 7: pcu_sock: forward downlink IMMEDAITE ASSIGNMENT to AGCH
pcu_sock: forward downlink IMMEDAITE ASSIGNMENT with no IMSI to AGCH
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33829/comment/8e090a4a_e97a031e
PS2, Line 14: ASSIGNMENT through the AGCH then.
Please explain *why* it is more appropriate to do so. Because the assume the MS is potentially in the middle of a GMM Attach procedure and hence in non-DRX mode, so it's listening on all CCCH blocks.
A spec reference would also be welcome pointing to TS 44.060 DRX section.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33829
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaa3e5cdcf86578821e149b3e23482a0bcee19f7b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33829
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:36:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment