Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32243 )
Change subject: Properly report all states through NM FSM upon OML link up
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32243
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic3358629d17baab46f467a1ab82eea1837ad7390
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32243
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:44:19 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32242 )
Change subject: nm: Document current state of SW_ACT in TRX related objects
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32242
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie24503b25b9c8042edae696d5b002933c73d00fb
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32242
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:40:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32240 )
Change subject: Move GPRS NSE under BTS SiteMgr
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
File include/osmo-bts/bts_sm.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32240/comment/4e462ef5_7d6c4ca6
PS1, Line 43: gprs
`pcu_state` is also related to GPRS, but not part of this struct. Do we really need to anonymous struct? Can we just call the new field `gprs_nse` instead?
File src/common/bts_sm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32240/comment/020292e7_823a94b8
PS1, Line 77: %d", 0
just have `0` in the format string and use `osmo_fsm_inst_update_id()`?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32240
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If44d8f256cab7b2660900cedfb0ed9fe67eb3420
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32240
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:39:26 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236 )
Change subject: Merge gsm_network into gsm_bts_sm and place gsm_bts under it
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(5 comments)
File src/common/bts.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/489e1cde_858a2437
PS4, Line 406: g_bts_sm->num_bts++;
I find this weird that a BTS is added to `&g_bts_sm->bts_list` in `gsm_bts_alloc()`, but `g_bts_sm->num_bts` is incremented here. Any reason why not doing both in a single place?
File src/common/bts_sm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/5db95b4f_626a08c0
PS4, Line 37: talloc_free
talloc does free() all its children anyway, do we really need to do this manually?
File src/common/oml.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/303c0b76_a4442e9a
PS4, Line 154: if (!bts) {
`OSMO_UNLIKELY`?
File src/common/pcu_sock.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/f3386730_2dd687d2
PS4, Line 897: struct gsm_bts_sm *bts_sm
Can we remove this argument since `g_bts_sm` is available globally?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/cbdf3323_bafcfcd0
PS4, Line 957: struct gsm_bts_sm *bts_sm
Can we remove this argument since `g_bts_sm` is available globally?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ideb0d458ec631008223f861cf8b46d09524a1a21
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32236
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:31:07 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment