March 2023 - gerrit-log - lists.osmocom.org

[S] Change in pysim[master]: filesystem: decode select response for MF

by laforge

laforge has abandoned this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/23209 ) Change subject: filesystem: decode select response for MF ...................................................................... Abandoned -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/23209 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib2b2476fc0e7d34cdacf7eb100ffadceb788c4d2 Gerrit-Change-Number: 23209 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: abandon

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[S] Change in osmo-sip-connector[master]: sip: log release caused by status >= 300 as error

by laforge

Attention is currently required from: osmith, neels, fixeria. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sip-connector/+/32018 ) Change subject: sip: log release caused by status >= 300 as error ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1 (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: according to the spec >= 400 is an error. "300 <= x < 400" is a redirect. So printing an ERROR for the range 300..399 is wrong. We might print some notice that we're not implementing redirects, but that's not an error. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sip-connector/+/32018 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-sip-connector Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I64889d6ce174dc17d44d85aac12e7ee6e6b06164 Gerrit-Change-Number: 32018 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:50:38 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in osmo-mgw[master]: mgcp_codec: fix oa/bwe comparison in mgcp_codec_pt_translate()

by laforge

Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/27392 ) Change subject: mgcp_codec: fix oa/bwe comparison in mgcp_codec_pt_translate() ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) File src/libosmo-mgcp/mgcp_codec.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/27392/comment/f758ae49_66c732aa PS1, Line 369: static bool codecs_same(struct mgcp_rtp_codec *codec_a, struct mgcp_rtp_codec *codec_b, bool match_pload_fmt) > Format conversion *is* transcoding :D Yes, format conversion is transcoding in a "scientific" definition of the word. But maybe let's call one translating (format conversion) and reserve transcoding for the case commonly known as transcoding. So I propose: * conversion as a general term for any kind * transcoding for something where we actually go through the audio codec * translation for some other mangling of payload format that doesn't involve an audio codec -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/27392 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-mgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifbd201a2749009a4644a29bd77e1d0fc0c124a9d Gerrit-Change-Number: 27392 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:37:58 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in osmo-mgw[master]: mgcp_codec: fix oa/bwe comparison in mgcp_codec_pt_translate()

by laforge

Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/27392 ) Change subject: mgcp_codec: fix oa/bwe comparison in mgcp_codec_pt_translate() ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) File src/libosmo-mgcp/mgcp_codec.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/27392/comment/402d876e_97045340 PS1, Line 431: /* In case we weren't able to find an exact match, we will try to find a match that is the same codec, but the > I think that was precisely my point at the time (some weeks ago when I wrote my comment). […] agreeing with pespin -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/27392 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-mgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifbd201a2749009a4644a29bd77e1d0fc0c124a9d Gerrit-Change-Number: 27392 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:35:29 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[S] Change in osmo-upf[master]: unique_ids_test.c: fix coverity ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT

by laforge

laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/32019 ) Change subject: unique_ids_test.c: fix coverity ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT ...................................................................... unique_ids_test.c: fix coverity ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT Do the assignment separately, outside of the assert(). Related: CID#311450 Change-Id: I4490a62f444d5048779c9b184b5f580cecd4c149 --- M tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.c M tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.err 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Approvals: pespin: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve Jenkins Builder: Verified fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve laforge: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.c b/tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.c index 2120ab4..1a9b2b3 100644 --- a/tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.c +++ b/tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.c @@ -327,7 +327,8 @@ dump_state(); log_assert(s1->up_seid == 1); - log_assert(a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s1->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry)); + a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s1->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry); + log_assert(a); log_assert(a->kind == UP_GTP_U_TUNMAP); log_assert(a->tunmap.core.tun.local.teid == 1); log_assert(a->tunmap.access.tun.local.teid == 2); @@ -345,7 +346,8 @@ dump_state(); log_assert(s2->up_seid == 2); - log_assert(a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s2->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry)); + a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s2->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry); + log_assert(a); log_assert(a->kind == UP_GTP_U_TUNMAP); log_assert(a->tunmap.core.tun.local.teid == 3); log_assert(a->tunmap.access.tun.local.teid == 4); @@ -370,7 +372,8 @@ dump_state(); log_assert(s3->up_seid == 1); - log_assert(a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s3->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry)); + a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s3->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry); + log_assert(a); log_assert(a->kind == UP_GTP_U_TUNMAP); log_assert(a->tunmap.core.tun.local.teid == 1); log_assert(a->tunmap.access.tun.local.teid == 2); @@ -383,7 +386,8 @@ dump_state(); log_assert(s4->up_seid == 3); - log_assert(a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s4->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry)); + a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s4->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry); + log_assert(a); log_assert(a->kind == UP_GTP_U_TUNMAP); log_assert(a->tunmap.core.tun.local.teid == 5); log_assert(a->tunmap.access.tun.local.teid == 6); diff --git a/tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.err b/tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.err index f9ea23a..d0565c8 100644 --- a/tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.err +++ b/tests/unique_ids/unique_ids_test.err @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ | session[ESTABLISHED]: UP-SEID 0x1; chain_id access=1 core=2; local TEID access=0x2 core=0x1 assert(s1->up_seid == 1) -assert(a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s1->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry)) +assert(a) assert(a->kind == UP_GTP_U_TUNMAP) assert(a->tunmap.core.tun.local.teid == 1) assert(a->tunmap.access.tun.local.teid == 2) @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ | session[ESTABLISHED]: UP-SEID 0x2; chain_id access=3 core=4; local TEID access=0x4 core=0x3 assert(s2->up_seid == 2) -assert(a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s2->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry)) +assert(a) assert(a->kind == UP_GTP_U_TUNMAP) assert(a->tunmap.core.tun.local.teid == 3) assert(a->tunmap.access.tun.local.teid == 4) @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ | session[ESTABLISHED]: UP-SEID 0x2; chain_id access=3 core=4; local TEID access=0x4 core=0x3 assert(s3->up_seid == 1) -assert(a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s3->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry)) +assert(a) assert(a->kind == UP_GTP_U_TUNMAP) assert(a->tunmap.core.tun.local.teid == 1) assert(a->tunmap.access.tun.local.teid == 2) @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ | session[ESTABLISHED]: UP-SEID 0x2; chain_id access=3 core=4; local TEID access=0x4 core=0x3 assert(s4->up_seid == 3) -assert(a = llist_first_entry_or_null(&s4->active_gtp_actions, struct up_gtp_action, entry)) +assert(a) assert(a->kind == UP_GTP_U_TUNMAP) assert(a->tunmap.core.tun.local.teid == 5) assert(a->tunmap.access.tun.local.teid == 6) -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/32019 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-upf Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I4490a62f444d5048779c9b184b5f580cecd4c149 Gerrit-Change-Number: 32019 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: merged

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[S] Change in osmo-upf[master]: unique_ids_test.c: fix coverity ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT

by laforge

Attention is currently required from: neels. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/32019 ) Change subject: unique_ids_test.c: fix coverity ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/32019 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-upf Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I4490a62f444d5048779c9b184b5f580cecd4c149 Gerrit-Change-Number: 32019 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:33:56 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in osmocom-bb[master]: layer23: modem: Test GMM layer through VTY

by laforge

Attention is currently required from: Hoernchen, pespin, fixeria. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/32022 ) Change subject: layer23: modem: Test GMM layer through VTY ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/32022 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmocom-bb Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iba0663075468670a29aceafe5196cae3cab050eb Gerrit-Change-Number: 32022 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Hoernchen <ewild(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: Hoernchen <ewild(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:33:32 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[S] Change in osmo-pcu[master]: pdch_ul_controller: log reserved frame numbers

by laforge

Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31022 ) Change subject: pdch_ul_controller: log reserved frame numbers ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) Patchset: PS3: looks like the test output needs to be updated with the additional line that's printed now? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31022 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I4277c572a4cc6cbbf3ac4e67442c9036be687627 Gerrit-Change-Number: 31022 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:32:59 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[S] Change in pysim[master]: pySim-shell: add cardinfo command

by laforge

Attention is currently required from: dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/25805 ) Change subject: pySim-shell: add cardinfo command ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) File pySim-shell.py: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/25805/comment/148f8c8d_73dad69b PS2, Line 611: p > pyscard.connection. […] the transport code already works this way: the get_atr() method retrieves acached version of the atr, even for serial or other readers. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/25805 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If31ed17102dc0108e27a5eb0344aabaaf19b19f9 Gerrit-Change-Number: 25805 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:32:16 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[S] Change in pysim[master]: pySim-shell: add cardinfo command

by laforge

Attention is currently required from: dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/25805 ) Change subject: pySim-shell: add cardinfo command ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) File pySim-shell.py: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/25805/comment/9c3e7511_f4c05f0a PS2, Line 611: p > Reading the ATR would require a card reset. […] pyscard.connection.getATR() should just retrieve the cached ATR from the last time the card was reset. I doubt it would issue a new reset? at lesat that's how I remember it. For other card readers, our "driver" classes should implement the same, if they don't do that already: Always keep the most recent ATR in cache so that the user of the "driver" api can retrieve it later. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/25805 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If31ed17102dc0108e27a5eb0344aabaaf19b19f9 Gerrit-Change-Number: 25805 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:31:08 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

gerrit-log March 2023