Attention is currently required from: jolly.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34986?usp=email )
Change subject: LAPDm: Add support for RTS based polling
......................................................................
Patch Set 10: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
File src/gsm/lapdm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34986/comment/e268b0e3_44823ce9
PS10, Line 1619: i
array should be "const uint32_t *" as it's just read and never modified.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34986/comment/7ee541e2_3f9052f1
PS10, Line 1631: void lapdm_channel_set_t200_fn(struct lapdm_channel *lc, uint32_t *t200_fn_dcch, uint32_t *t200_fn_acch)
arrays should be "const uint32_t *" as it's just read and never modified.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34986?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6ebe83f829d7751ea9de1d90eb478c7a628db64c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34986
Gerrit-PatchSet: 10
Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:19:06 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: jolly.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34985?usp=email )
Change subject: LAPD: Add support for RTS based polling and T200
......................................................................
Patch Set 7: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34985?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib961b5a44911b99b0487641533301749c0286995
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34985
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:16:04 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: jolly.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35047?usp=email )
Change subject: BTS_Tests_LAPDm.TC_nr_seq_error: Fix test
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
I think this needs a more elaborate explanation. Why do we need to involve the (simulated) BSC here? Shouldn't the LAPDm instaince in the BTS itself disconnect LAPDm and send a REL_IND to the BTS? Note it's been ages since I last looked at any of this, but definitely we need some explanation in the commit log other than "fix ..."
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35047?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4cdff6ab607e158d4956a1bd87f74e9e75579cff
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35047
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:10:07 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: jolly.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35054?usp=email )
Change subject: BTS_Tests_LAPDm.TC_sabm_retransmit_bts: Fix time to wait
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35054?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I593008420f58cc1d5e4778874f9071914d24f82e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35054
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:08:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: neels.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35053?usp=email )
Change subject: msc: test re-assignment to match codec with MT
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File msc/BSC_ConnectionHandler.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35053/comment/d3cd5aa7_9ca6…
PS2, Line 1723: cpars.re_ass_compl_chosen_codec
Now that this argument is part of the `cpars`, is there still a need to pass it separately, given that we do pass the whole `cpars`? I mean, this function can now access `re_ass_compl_chosen_codec` via the given `cpars`...
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35053?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I402ed0523a2a87b83f29c5577b2c828102005d53
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35053
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:18:50 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: neels.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35052?usp=email )
Change subject: msc: split off f_mo_call_establish__handle_assignment_request()
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(3 comments)
File msc/BSC_ConnectionHandler.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35052/comment/f2ba93a0_1daf…
PS2, Line 1557: f_mo_call_establish__handle_assignment_request
Hmm, I find the double low-dash a bit weird, but guessing you did it intentionally?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35052/comment/d0db350a_0c78…
PS2, Line 1573: not match(ass_req.pdu.bssmap.assignmentRequest.aoIPTransportLayer, tla_ass1
btw, this matching statement can be simplified a bit to:
```
if (not match(ass_req.pdu.bssmap.assignmentRequest.aoIPTransportLayer, (tla_ass1, tla_ass2))
```
not strictly related to this patch, just an idea
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35052/comment/75febbd8_3e1d…
PS2, Line 1690: valueof(ts_CodecFR
Hmm, so now you're explicitly passing `ts_CodecFR`, but the new function may overwrite it to `ts_CodecCSData`. I find this confusing. Passing the right codec template here _conditionally_ would be cleaner, IMO:
```
if (cpars.csd) {
f_mo_call_establish__handle_assignment_request(cpars, bssap, valueof(ts_CodecCSData));
} else {
f_mo_call_establish__handle_assignment_request(cpars, bssap, valueof(ts_CodecFR));
}
```
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/35052?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I98c6171a592dfe1573e15136c4ecf4ff234048d7
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35052
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:14:19 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment