Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-cbc/+/28602 )
Change subject: Add initial SBc-AP support to osmo-cbc
......................................................................
Patch Set 10:
(4 comments)
File include/osmocom/cbc/cbc_data.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-cbc/+/28602/comment/56c05280_a0b510eb
PS10, Line 23: CBC_PEER_PROTO_SBcAP
cosmetic: missing comma
File include/osmocom/cbc/internal.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-cbc/+/28602/comment/a6eff4be_d01902c2
PS10, Line 30: enum sbcap_server_event {
So we have the same set of events as in enum cbsp_server_event. Can both FSMs simply use a single unified set of events?
File src/cbc_data.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-cbc/+/28602/comment/9947dc6a_f858f547
PS10, Line 104:
ws, 'unsigned int i' could be added here (scoped variable)
File src/smscb_peer_fsm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-cbc/+/28602/comment/520e6770_6221b929
PS10, Line 483:
cosmetic: there should be no space here
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-cbc/+/28602
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-cbc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib278bc1d1a74459814016fef7a8fe21cc29d46c9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28602
Gerrit-PatchSet: 10
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:10:30 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: neels, laforge, pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/28214 )
Change subject: BSC_Tests: add TC_chan_alloc_algo_{a,de}scending
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS4:
> I understand why a NACK makes things quicker, but it is surely better to model […]
Hi Neels. Thanks for your feedback!
BSC_Tests.TC_ratectr_all_available_allocated is not a good example because is not doing TCH assignment. It's simply filling up all SDCCH channels, what makes osmo-bsc allocate TCH channels for signalling.
Regarding the VTY scripts, it would have been a better option indeed. But unfortunately I ran out of time budget, so I cannot spend more time on this task.
Patchset:
PS5:
> unfortunately even v4 still going through the NACK case, something both neels and I have been expres […]
The main problem preventing me from implementing proper assignment scenarios is the complexity of MGCP_Emulation component. It was designed to be executed on MSC_ConnHdlr component, and there is no easy way to make it run on the test_CT. And I cannot spawn MSC_ConnHdlr components here because multi-trx support is currently only implemented for the test_CT.
I ran out of time budget, so I cannot spend more hours on this task. Reworking the MGCP_Emulation to support running on test_CT would be a lot of work (I tried to do so, but quickly gave up). Implementing multi-trx support for the test_CT also seems like a lot of work.
I am fine with not merging this patchset or even abandoning it. These testcases were useful for me during development of SYS#5460, so I didn't have to play ping-pong with the customer saying that "it should work find" and getting "it does not" in a loop.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/28214
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic74a9cd264320a9a17648f9331b67fb2c2404122
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28214
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:49:27 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment