Attention is currently required from: pespin.
daniel has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30370 )
Change subject: paging: Optimize retrieving number of request per paging group
......................................................................
Patch Set 4: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30370
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6994127827d120a0b4dd3de51e1ddde39f2fe531
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30370
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:09:53 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30362 )
Change subject: paging: Fix wrong count of reqs_before if queue only contains retransmissions
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30362
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib2e810b0bcc51eac117713584310272462c58867
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30362
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:06:04 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
daniel has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30363 )
Change subject: paging: Split paging queue into 2 queues: initial and retrans
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File src/osmo-bsc/paging.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30363/comment/f92f427a_55b45a92
PS1, Line 263: bts_pag_st->initial_req_list_len--;
You already adjust the *_list_len accordingly in paging_remove_request(). I'd suggest to do that in paging_req_timeout_trans() as well if req->attempts == 0
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30363
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib68f2169e3790aea4ac77ec20ad79f242b7c2747
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30363
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:57:33 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: msuraev.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30304 )
Change subject: rate_ctr: update estimation code
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS7:
Fine with the refactoring here, but I'm still not convienced splitting 1 timerfd into 4 is needed nor a good idea.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30304
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I07232e9ff8bd62403ae82d9bd60d967d40b54ebc
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30304
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:11:52 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: msuraev.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30302 )
Change subject: rate_ctr: convert to timerfd
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
File src/rate_ctr.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30302/comment/c2948534_67cc663c
PS3, Line 359: timer_ticks++;
> No, why would I do that? The timer_ticks is updated manually every time timer ticks (pun intended). […]
yes, but if a timer is lost due to the CPU being too loaded, you still want to tick the lost event I guess?
My understanding is that rate_ctr_group_intv() should be updated to take into account that timer_ticks can be increased more than once at a time, eg by storing last_timer_ticks, incrementing one vari ehre locally, passing it so that it can see if it lot the tick which should have updated it.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30302
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2525fd691caa380a862d305cfcb4fa3cc50b70d0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30302
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:09:48 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment