Attention is currently required from: fixeria, osmith, pespin.
laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/38375?usp=email )
Change subject: ss7 vty: Fix insert order of routes with higher priority
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(1 comment)
File tests/vty/osmo_stp_route_prio.vty:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/38375/comment/4ae0ddab_5f17d…
:
PS2, Line 87: 3.2.1/14 0 as3 ? ? ?
@laforge@gnumonks.org I'm fine with that, I can do
that in a follow-up patch. Something related to discuss though: We are currently storing
the value in uint32_t value in strcut osmo_ss7_route cfg.
We could make that one a uint8_t, but that may break ABI compatibility.I'll check
because anyway since we added secondary_pc we are already breaking ABI since last version.
I wouldn't bother. It doesn't hurt to store that value as uint32_t at all.
TBH I think we should break ABI once and move as many
as possible of those structs into private headers. Same goes for most of the APIs too.
This would make it far easier improving the library, since anyway when adding features
will keep otherwise breaking ABI again and again.
That's a separate discussion, unrelated.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/38375?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sigtran
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6e7b5e3f06ae2c9468da58c55d2f42cbcd777218
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38375
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:48:09 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>