Attention is currently required from: laforge.

neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/31765 )

Change subject: hnbgw: add f_rua_expect() ......................................................................

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS1:

I'm not sure if this is really best handled in a function. […]

I completely agree with the flexibility of altsteps -- however, for example in f_iu2iuh() we want to return the received RUA message. An altstep cannot have a return value, so that's a bummer. Also it seems we cannot use a "-> value msg" syntax with "[] as_rua_expect()". So the only way I see is have code dup, once as f_foo_expect() returning the received message, and once as as_foo_expect() without a return value?