Attention is currently required from: laforge. neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/31765 ) Change subject: hnbgw: add f_rua_expect() ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: I completely agree with the flexibility of altsteps -- however, for example in f_iu2iuh() we want to return the received RUA message. An altstep cannot have a return value, so that's a bummer. Also it seems we cannot use a "-> value msg" syntax with "[] as_rua_expect()". So the only way I see is have code dup, once as f_foo_expect() returning the received message, and once as as_foo_expect() without a return value? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/31765 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I29e6b7659ba53efee9f676197b502f79780ead7e Gerrit-Change-Number: 31765 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:28:45 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment