Attention is currently required from: dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34575?usp=email )
Change subject: gprs_rlcmac_sched: check if we really use direct phy
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
I am not sure if I understand the question correctly.
[…]
Ah I see it now, in common code:
#ifdef ENABLE_DIRECT_PHY
bts->trx[trx_nr].fl1h = l1if_open_trx(
...
#endif
This is called though based on this condition:
if ((info_ind->flags & PCU_IF_FLAG_SYSMO)
&& info_ind->trx[trx_nr].hlayer1) {
Are you passing PCUIF_FLAG_SYSMO when using an RBS from within osmo-bsc? this looks wrong
imho, that flag is SYSMO specific and doesn't relate to RBS? Or maybe we don't
need anything SYSMO specific and we can rename it?
I envision at some point the PCU needs to know the type of BTS, so it knows how to hook to
it on the l1if. And knowing if it's SYSMO or not is not enough imho.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34575?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0808950b1154bbb9a789c3f706ad9fb6618764ec
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34575
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:37:27 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment