Attention is currently required from: fixeria, dexter.
neels has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497
)
Change subject: pcu_sock: activate/deactivate PDCH on pcu reconnect
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(8 comments)
File doc/timeslot.msc:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/e9a8d2f6_ea8faa96
PS2, Line 95: bsc_ts abox bsc_ts [label="UNUSED"];
Thats true, Can we shorten this since the mechanism is
already explained above. […]
(Dots are not sufficient to indicate an omission, they
mean to wait for an async event.)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/c59c7118_1204e859
PS2, Line 98: "
Done
(I actually meant literally "\n"
to force a line break, but i tested and it looks fine like this)
https://people.osmocom.org/neels/kes0Chie/timeslot.png
File doc/timeslot.msc:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/7999f20f_f7833d3a
PS9, Line 95: bsc_ts box bsc_ts [label="release PDCH"];
: ...;
ok i'll be happy if you replace these two lines with
bts note bsc_ts [label="PDCH release, see WAIT_PDCH_DEACT above"]
(i.e. use a "note" and explicitly refer to another place, and span across all
the lines involved)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/a6d0b606_0a495a6c
PS9, Line 104: bsc_ts box bsc_ts [label="activate PDCH"];
: ...;
...and replace these two lines with
bts note bsc_ts [label="PDCH activation, see WAIT_PDCH_ACT above"]
File src/osmo-bsc/pcu_sock.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/f28c813f_a2d43bcd
PS9, Line 803: * not need any extra activation/deactivation of PDCHs. */
i thought more like this:
/* BSC co-located PCU applies only to Ericsson RBS, which supports only
GSM_PCHAN_OSMO_DYN.
* So we need to deact only on this pchan kind. */
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/83938bf7_8265ec42
PS9, Line 974: See comment above)
it is not clear what this refers to ... just drop this? or explicitly say what you mean to
say.
I think you mean
/* BSC co-located PCU applies only to Ericsson RBS, which supports only
GSM_PCHAN_OSMO_DYN.
* So we need to act only on this pchan kind. */
File src/osmo-bsc/timeslot_fsm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/913feae1_ae0495ed
PS9, Line 347: }
it is very easy and quick to put the code move in a separate patch preceding this patch,
so that the addition of 'is_ericsson_bts()' is not "hidden" in the moved
code block. i would appreciate that, also for future readers of the git log. You can even
+2 that patch yourself saying "trivial" -- because it would be only a cosmetic
move of unchanged code. I could also do that for you if it helps...
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/857b9996_9020a13d
PS9, Line 1128: NOTE
i'm really puzzled why you seem to start every comment everywhere with
"NOTE:" -- it is completely redundant and has no meaning at all
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9ea0c53a5e68a51c781ef43bae71f947cdb95678
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31497
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:05:50 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment