Attention is currently required from: fixeria, dexter. neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497 ) Change subject: pcu_sock: activate/deactivate PDCH on pcu reconnect ...................................................................... Patch Set 9: (8 comments) File doc/timeslot.msc: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/e9a8d2f6_ea8faa96 PS2, Line 95: bsc_ts abox bsc_ts [label="UNUSED"];
Thats true, Can we shorten this since the mechanism is already explained above. […] (Dots are not sufficient to indicate an omission, they mean to wait for an async event.)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/c59c7118_1204e859 PS2, Line 98: "
Done (I actually meant literally "\n" to force a line break, but i tested and it looks fine like this)
https://people.osmocom.org/neels/kes0Chie/timeslot.png File doc/timeslot.msc: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/7999f20f_f7833d3a PS9, Line 95: bsc_ts box bsc_ts [label="release PDCH"]; : ...; ok i'll be happy if you replace these two lines with bts note bsc_ts [label="PDCH release, see WAIT_PDCH_DEACT above"] (i.e. use a "note" and explicitly refer to another place, and span across all the lines involved) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/a6d0b606_0a495a6c PS9, Line 104: bsc_ts box bsc_ts [label="activate PDCH"]; : ...; ...and replace these two lines with bts note bsc_ts [label="PDCH activation, see WAIT_PDCH_ACT above"] File src/osmo-bsc/pcu_sock.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/f28c813f_a2d43bcd PS9, Line 803: * not need any extra activation/deactivation of PDCHs. */ i thought more like this: /* BSC co-located PCU applies only to Ericsson RBS, which supports only GSM_PCHAN_OSMO_DYN. * So we need to deact only on this pchan kind. */ https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/83938bf7_8265ec42 PS9, Line 974: See comment above) it is not clear what this refers to ... just drop this? or explicitly say what you mean to say. I think you mean /* BSC co-located PCU applies only to Ericsson RBS, which supports only GSM_PCHAN_OSMO_DYN. * So we need to act only on this pchan kind. */ File src/osmo-bsc/timeslot_fsm.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/913feae1_ae0495ed PS9, Line 347: } it is very easy and quick to put the code move in a separate patch preceding this patch, so that the addition of 'is_ericsson_bts()' is not "hidden" in the moved code block. i would appreciate that, also for future readers of the git log. You can even +2 that patch yourself saying "trivial" -- because it would be only a cosmetic move of unchanged code. I could also do that for you if it helps... https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497/comment/857b9996_9020a13d PS9, Line 1128: NOTE i'm really puzzled why you seem to start every comment everywhere with "NOTE:" -- it is completely redundant and has no meaning at all -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31497 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I9ea0c53a5e68a51c781ef43bae71f947cdb95678 Gerrit-Change-Number: 31497 Gerrit-PatchSet: 9 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:05:50 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment