Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
dexter has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34105
)
Change subject: pcuif_proto: remove unnecessary members from gsm_pcu_if_data_cnf_dt
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS1:
a msg_id assigned by PCU is certainly enough, since
it's the PCU taking care of internally keeping s […]
I wonder if Ericsson really
uses the TLLI as an identifier. Maybe that is only what we first assumed when we saw that
it is a 4 byte identifier. As far as I remember they call it a "Mobile
Identifier", so it's not explicitly said that the identifier has to be a TLLI.
I have had also a look at the IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT SENT message. There we only get the
"Mobile Identifier" back, but not the frame number or anything other that would
make the confirmation more unique.
So yes, we should do the actual matching in the PCU, then we can improve this from there
and hand out guaranteed unique identifiers later.
PS1:
All the corresponding patches were ready and are merged. I think we can merge this one
too, so I add +2 now.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34105
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I779605858648e2a1c202c37e197a6e32e6ea3786
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34105
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:05:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment