Attention is currently required from: pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/32596 )
Change subject: layer23: Introduce apn_fsm
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
File src/host/layer23/src/common/apn_fsm.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/32596/comment/0a01b0bc_e042f00c
PS2, Line 103: apn_fsm_state_chg(fi, APN_ST_DISABLED);
Don't we need to check *((bool *)data)? I guess the assumption is that it is false
here, as I understand the BTS/other layers would send that to disable the APN, and then
later on send it again with true to enable it again?
Same for st_apn_active().
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/32596/comment/b52edfe0_a75fe921
PS2, Line 139: apn_fsm_state_chg(fi, APN_ST_INACTIVE);
* is this correct, receiving CTX_ACC and then going to inactive here?
* what about APN_EV_RX_SM_ACT_PDP_CTX_REJ?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/32596
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmocom-bb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2cc732dfb020d31ab89025e7e22276b819dcb24a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32596
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 10:34:16 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment