Attention is currently required from: pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/37189?usp=email )
Change subject: Osmocom_CTRL: counters: return -1 for absent objects
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
imho f_ctrl_get_ratectr_abs() is conceived to be used
when a rate ctr should be obtained, and fail o […]
I thought about that actually.
- Our tests currently pass, hence this patch affects no callers at all.
(any absent object would currently setverdict(fail) unconditionally)
- Future tests implicitly expect counters >= 0, and would fail if they get -1 instead,
simply by verifying the expected counters as we already do.
- If a test tests for a before-after diff of a counter, it will get unexpected diff values
when a counter returns -1. (One corner case is expecting that a counter diff remains zero,
which should always also have a phase of the test where the same counter increments; one
of these phases will fail on an absent object.)
So, no additional code needed to handle -1 return values, in all practical situations.
That is why I did not continue to carry the on_error param further out to
f_ctrl_get_ratectr_abs().
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/37189?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id00bbfe721d453e5f551e6d47e1b1d03d219700b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37189
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 02:55:17 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment