Attention is currently required from: pespin.
laforge has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/36081?usp=email )
Change subject: Introduce concept of per-HNB persistent data structure
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
File src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_vty.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/36081/comment/8ee08c8b_e745aa8d
PS2, Line 825: "hnb UMTS_CELL_ID",
why doing it this way instead of doing it like in
osmo-bsc? Just wondering, I'm fine with this too.
the way we do it in the BSC
was based around the idea that there is a 0-255 bts_nr, which in turn has its basis in TS
12.21 OML. Here we don't have an equivalent to that. Any number/index we come up
with is completely arbitrary.
So rather than inventing some new number that is not resembled anywhere, lets use
something that appears in reality. That's either the umts cell identity, or the
identity string sent during HNBAP register.
I originally had used the identity string in an earlier version of the patch, but during
discussion with a customer I had to agree with them that the "UMTS CGI
equivalent" is the better _primary key_, as it is unique for each cell in the
network. The identity string of the hNodeB is something usually determined by the
manufacturer, and it has no inherent meaning to the operator (like MAC-address derived
strings, manufacturer serial numbers, ...)
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/36081?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ife89a7a206836bd89334d19d3cf8c92969dd74de
Gerrit-Change-Number: 36081
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 17:46:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment