Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, laforge, pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change by pespin. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39690?usp=email )
Change subject: sccp: Allow marking UNIT-DATA.req Sequence Control param non-presence, set
SLS
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(2 comments)
File src/sccp_sclc.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39690/comment/f29df5e2_38a19…
:
PS2, Line 38: *
@laforge@gnumonks.org I removed those from here
because theycare not really related to this file. […]
Done
File src/sccp_sclc.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39690/comment/793433fa_423c7…
:
PS3, Line 84: xua->mtp.sls = rand() & 0xf;
this looks like it could by chance become the same sls as in the seq_ctrl present case
below. Is this desired? Maybe the intention was to do `& 0xf0`?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39690?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sigtran
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I834e91c1ec337713b0e684cf4fd7de854150bef6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39690
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:12:02 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>